What should a pesticide applicator avoid when discussing risks with the public?

Using comparisons of different risks when discussing pesticide application with the public can lead to misunderstandings or misinterpretations. While it's important to communicate the potential risks associated with pesticides, drawing comparisons can imply that some risks are negligible or more acceptable without a full understanding of the context, which can undermine the seriousness of the discussion.

Instead, focusing on transparent and straightforward communication about the specific risks associated with the pesticide in question allows for a better understanding. By being clear about the risks involved, listening to community feedback, and addressing concerns honestly, the applicator helps build trust and fosters an open dialogue with the public. This approach promotes an informed assessment of the situation rather than a potentially misleading comparison that could escalate fears or dismiss valid concerns.